Data Privacy & Protection Law · Mandatory where it applies

US State Privacy Laws: What SaaS and IT Companies Must Do

With no general federal privacy law, US states have passed their own consumer privacy laws. Starting with California and Virginia, around 20 states now have such laws in effect, most following a similar model: thresholds based on the number of state residents, rights to access, correct, delete and port data, opt-outs from targeted advertising, sale and profiling, consent for sensitive data, data protection assessments, processor contracts and enforcement by the attorney general.

US state privacy laws compliance guide cover

The United States has no general federal privacy law, so US state privacy laws fill the gap. California went first with the CCPA in 2020, Virginia followed in 2023, and by October 2026 around 20 states had general consumer privacy laws in effect, with Oklahoma and others due to follow from January 2027. For any SaaS, e-commerce or app business with a national US customer base, several of these laws apply at once.

The good news is that most states follow a similar model, so a single well-designed privacy program can cover nearly all of them. This guide explains which states have laws, how thresholds work, the common rights and duties, where states differ, what processors (vendors) must do, and how to build one program that works across states. California has its own guide: see CCPA and CPRA.

What are US state privacy laws?

These are state statutes that give residents rights over their personal data and impose duties on businesses that collect it. They differ from older sector laws such as HIPAA for health data, GLBA for financial institutions and COPPA for children under 13, because they apply across sectors to most personal data. They also differ from state data breach notification laws, which all 50 states have, and from narrower laws on biometrics (such as Illinois BIPA) or consumer health data (such as Washington's My Health My Data Act).

Those narrower laws can matter as much as the general ones. Washington's My Health My Data Act, for example, covers consumer health data well beyond HIPAA, requires separate consent for collection and sharing, applies without a revenue or volume threshold, and gives consumers a private right of action. Apps that infer health information from fitness, purchase or location data should check it alongside the general state laws.

Most non-California laws follow the model set by the Virginia Consumer Data Protection Act, often called the Virginia or Washington Privacy Act model, using GDPR-style terms: controllers decide why and how data is processed; processors act on their behalf.

Which states have laws in effect?

The table lists the main laws and effective dates. The count changes often, so check the IAPP tracker in the sources for the current position.

StateLawEffective
CaliforniaCCPA as amended by CPRA1 January 2020; CPRA 1 January 2023
VirginiaConsumer Data Protection Act1 January 2023
ColoradoColorado Privacy Act1 July 2023
ConnecticutConnecticut Data Privacy Act1 July 2023; major amendments 1 July 2026
UtahConsumer Privacy Act31 December 2023
TexasData Privacy and Security Act1 July 2024
OregonConsumer Privacy Act1 July 2024
MontanaConsumer Data Privacy Act1 October 2024
Iowa, Delaware, Nebraska, New HampshireSeparate state acts1 January 2025
New JerseyData Privacy Act15 January 2025
TennesseeInformation Protection Act1 July 2025
MinnesotaConsumer Data Privacy Act31 July 2025
MarylandOnline Data Privacy Act1 October 2025
Indiana, Kentucky, Rhode IslandSeparate state acts1 January 2026
OklahomaConsumer Data Privacy Act (SB 546, signed 20 March 2026)1 January 2027

Florida has a narrower Digital Bill of Rights that applies only to very large companies, which is why trackers sometimes give different totals.

Who must comply? Thresholds

Most laws apply to businesses that conduct business in the state or target its residents and, in a calendar year, either control or process personal data of at least 100,000 state consumers (excluding data processed only to complete a payment), or of at least 25,000 consumers while earning a set share of revenue from selling personal data. States vary these numbers: some smaller states use lower counts, Connecticut lowered its threshold to 35,000 consumers from 1 July 2026, and Texas and Nebraska apply to any business that is not a small business under federal Small Business Administration definitions, with a ban on selling sensitive data without consent applying even to small businesses.

"Consumer" usually means a resident acting in an individual or household context. Unlike California, most states exclude employees and business-to-business contacts.

Common exemptions

  • State and local government bodies.
  • Nonprofits in many states, though Colorado, Oregon, Delaware, New Jersey, Minnesota and Maryland cover them in some form.
  • Financial institutions or data subject to GLBA, at entity level or data level depending on the state.
  • Covered entities and protected health information under HIPAA, again at entity or data level.
  • Higher education institutions in some states.
  • Data covered by FCRA, FERPA, COPPA-compliant processing and employment data.

Data-level exemptions are narrower: a bank in a data-level state must still apply the law to personal data not covered by GLBA, such as website analytics.

Consumer rights

Almost every law gives consumers rights to:

  • Confirm and access whether their data is processed.
  • Correct inaccuracies (Utah added this from 2026; Iowa does not provide it).
  • Delete personal data provided by or obtained about them.
  • Obtain a portable copy.
  • Opt out of targeted advertising, sale of personal data and profiling in furtherance of decisions with legal or similarly significant effects.

Some states add more: Oregon and Minnesota give a right to a list of specific third parties to which data was disclosed; Minnesota lets consumers question the result of profiling decisions and learn the reasons. Controllers usually have 45 days to respond, extendable once by 45 days, and must provide an appeal process with a further response deadline.

Sensitive data and children

Sensitive data typically includes racial or ethnic origin, religious beliefs, health diagnoses, sex life or sexual orientation, citizenship or immigration status, genetic and biometric data used for identification, precise geolocation and data of a known child. Many newer laws add transgender or non-binary status, national origin, and neural data. Most states require opt-in consent before processing sensitive data; California and Utah use opt-out for some uses. Maryland goes further: collecting and processing sensitive data must be strictly necessary to provide the requested product or service, and selling sensitive data is prohibited.

For children under 13, processing must follow COPPA consent. Several states, including Connecticut, Colorado, Oregon and Maryland, add protections for teenagers, such as bans on targeted advertising and sale for known minors under 16 or 18 and duties to assess risks to minors.

Universal opt-out signals

A growing number of states require controllers to honour universal opt-out mechanisms, such as the Global Privacy Control (GPC) browser signal, as a valid request to opt out of targeted advertising and sale. These include California, Colorado, Connecticut, Texas, Oregon, Montana, Delaware, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Nebraska, Minnesota and Maryland, with effective dates that vary. Colorado maintains a list of recognised mechanisms. In practice, any site that sells data or runs targeted advertising to US users should detect GPC and suppress advertising tags or data sharing for that browser.

Controller duties

  • Privacy notice describing categories of data, purposes, rights, how to exercise them, third parties and sales or targeted advertising.
  • Data minimisation and purpose limitation: collect what is adequate, relevant and reasonably necessary for disclosed purposes; Maryland and Minnesota set stricter standards.
  • Reasonable security appropriate to the volume and nature of data.
  • No discrimination against consumers who exercise rights, with allowances for loyalty programs.
  • Data protection assessments before processing for targeted advertising, sale, sensitive data, and profiling with significant risks, kept available for the attorney general on request.
  • Processor contracts with required terms.
  • Clear methods for exercising rights, at least one of which must be online for businesses operating online in several states.

What processors (vendors) must do

Most SaaS and IT companies act as processors for their business customers. Processors must:

  • Follow the controller's documented instructions.
  • Sign a contract specifying processing instructions, nature and purpose, data types, duration, and the parties' rights and obligations.
  • Ensure staff are bound by confidentiality.
  • Delete or return data at the end of services.
  • Make information available to show compliance and allow reasonable assessments or provide an independent assessment report.
  • Engage subprocessors only under written contracts with the same obligations, after giving the controller an opportunity to object.
  • Help the controller respond to rights requests, secure data, notify breaches and complete data protection assessments.

A processor that starts determining purposes and means becomes a controller for that processing. A single data processing addendum written to cover the common state requirements, GDPR and CCPA service provider terms is the usual approach.

Enforcement and penalties

State attorneys general enforce these laws; California also has a dedicated agency. Penalties are typically up to $7,500 per violation, with some states higher. Most laws had cure periods in their early years, letting businesses fix violations within 30 or 60 days after notice; several have expired, while Texas, Oklahoma and others keep a permanent cure right. None of the non-California laws gives consumers a private right of action under the privacy law itself. Attorneys general in Texas, Connecticut and California have been the most active, with actions on data sales, connected vehicles, location data and opt-out failures.

How to comply across states, step by step

  1. Map where your users are and estimate consumer counts per state to see which laws apply.
  2. Inventory personal data, flagging sensitive data, children's data, sales and targeted advertising.
  3. Adopt the strictest common denominator: opt-in for sensitive data, opt-outs for all states, GPC honoured everywhere.
  4. Write one US privacy notice with state-specific sections where needed.
  5. Build one rights request workflow with identity verification, 45-day deadlines and appeals.
  6. Run data protection assessments for advertising, sensitive data and profiling.
  7. Update contracts with processors and customers.
  8. Watch new laws and amendments each quarter.

Documentation you will need

  • Data inventory and map, with state applicability analysis.
  • Privacy notice and version history.
  • Rights request log with outcomes, timing and appeals.
  • Consent records for sensitive data.
  • Evidence of opt-out signal handling.
  • Data protection assessments.
  • Processor and subprocessor contracts.
  • Security policies and incident records.

Timeline and cost considerations

A business already compliant with the CCPA or GDPR can usually extend its program to other states in a few weeks: adding states to notices, enabling GPC, adding consent for sensitive data and updating contracts. A business starting from nothing might need three to six months. The main costs are engineering for rights requests and consent, legal review and consent management tools.

Common mistakes for SaaS and IT companies

  • Assuming only California matters.
  • Ignoring GPC or only showing a cookie banner without blocking tags.
  • Collecting sensitive data, such as health inferences or precise location, without opt-in consent.
  • Treating pixels and ad tags as harmless when they amount to sale or targeted advertising.
  • Using processor contracts that lack state-required terms.
  • No appeal process for denied requests.

Best practices, tools and technologies

  • Use a consent management platform configured for US states, honouring GPC server-side as well as in the browser.
  • Automate rights requests with a portal, verification and data discovery across systems.
  • Tag sensitive data fields in schemas so consent and retention rules can be enforced.
  • Keep a register of third parties receiving data.
  • Use privacy by design reviews for new features, aligned with the NIST Privacy Framework.

We build rights request workflows, consent-aware tag loading and GPC handling into web and SaaS platforms through our web application development service.

How state laws relate to other frameworks

Law or frameworkRelationship
CCPA/CPRACalifornia's broader law, covering employees and B2B data, with regulations and a dedicated agency.
GDPRMany concepts are borrowed from it; GDPR requires a lawful basis for all processing, while US states mostly use opt-outs.
COPPAFederal rule for children under 13 that state laws build on.
GLBA and HIPAASector laws whose covered data or entities are exempt.
ISO/IEC 27701Certifiable privacy management system that can support compliance.

Real-world example

An Indian-built US fitness app with users in all 50 states has over 100,000 users in several states. It treats workout-derived health data as sensitive and asks for opt-in consent, honours GPC by disabling advertising SDK sharing for those users, lets users access, correct, delete and export data from the app settings, answers requests within 45 days with an appeal link, runs a data protection assessment for its advertising and health data processing, and signs processor contracts with its analytics and cloud vendors. One program covers every state law that applies.

Next steps

  1. Estimate your users per state and list applicable laws.
  2. Find sensitive data, sales and targeted advertising in your product.
  3. Enable GPC and consent controls.
  4. Publish one US privacy notice and rights workflow.
  5. Set a quarterly review for new state laws.

Frequently asked questions

How many US states have privacy laws?

Around 20 states had general consumer privacy laws in effect as of October 2026, with more taking effect from 2027. Trackers differ slightly depending on whether narrower laws are counted.

Is there a federal US privacy law?

No general one. Federal privacy rules are sector-specific, such as HIPAA, GLBA and COPPA, and the FTC enforces against unfair or deceptive practices.

Do state privacy laws apply to companies outside the US?

Yes, if they conduct business in the state or target its residents and meet the thresholds.

What is the typical threshold?

Personal data of 100,000 state consumers a year, or 25,000 with significant revenue from selling data, though several states use lower or different tests.

Do I have to honour Global Privacy Control?

In a growing number of states, yes, as an opt-out of sale and targeted advertising.

Do these laws cover employee data?

Generally no, except in California.

How long do I have to respond to a rights request?

Usually 45 days, extendable once by another 45 days when reasonably necessary.

In most states, yes, as opt-in consent; Maryland restricts processing to what is strictly necessary and bans its sale.

Can consumers sue under these laws?

Not under the non-California laws; enforcement is by the attorney general. California allows suits for certain data breaches.

What must a processor contract include?

Instructions, data types, duration, confidentiality, deletion or return, assistance, audit or assessment rights and subprocessor terms.

What are the penalties?

Typically up to $7,500 per violation, enforced by state attorneys general.

Official sources

  1. US State Privacy Legislation Tracker (IAPP)
  2. Virginia Consumer Data Protection Act, Code of Virginia Title 59.1 Chapter 53 (Virginia General Assembly)
  3. Colorado Privacy Act (Colorado Attorney General)
  4. The Connecticut Data Privacy Act (Connecticut Attorney General)
  5. Texas Data Privacy and Security Act (Texas Attorney General)
  6. Global Privacy Control specification and overview (Global Privacy Control)

Review history

Last reviewed Oct 30, 2026. Next scheduled review Jan 30, 2027, or sooner if a state enacts a new privacy law, a major amendment takes effect, or a federal privacy law is passed.

  • : First published.

This guide explains the official requirements in plain language. It is not legal advice and does not tell you whether your organisation is compliant. Confirm with qualified counsel, your auditor or an accredited certification body.

Written by · Developers and project managers

Researched from the official sources listed above and written by WorldWin Coder's engineering team, who build the access controls, audit logging, encryption and privacy features that these rules ask for.

Related compliance
Law California, US

CCPA / CPRA

California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018, as amended by the California Privacy Rights Act of 2020 (Cal. Civ. Code 1798.100 and following), and CPPA regulations

The CCPA, as amended by the CPRA, is California's general consumer privacy law. It gives California residents the right to know, delete and correct personal information, to opt out of its sale or sharing for cross-context behavioural advertising, and to limit the use of sensitive personal information. It applies to for-profit businesses meeting revenue or data volume thresholds, requires specific contracts with service providers, and is enforced by a dedicated agency with fines per violation and a private right of action for some data breaches.

Read the guide
Law EU, with reach beyond it

GDPR

General Data Protection Regulation, Regulation (EU) 2016/679

The GDPR is the European Union's data protection law. It sets the rules for processing personal data of people in the EU: lawful bases, transparency, data minimisation, security, individual rights, breach notification within 72 hours, and limits on transfers outside the EU. It applies to EU organisations and to companies elsewhere that offer goods or services to people in the EU or monitor them. Fines can reach 20 million euros or 4 percent of worldwide annual turnover.

Read the guide
Law United States

COPPA

Children's Online Privacy Protection Act of 1998 and the FTC Children's Online Privacy Protection Rule (16 CFR Part 312), as amended in 2025

COPPA is the US law that protects the personal information of children under 13 online. Operators of websites, apps, games and services directed to children, or that knowingly collect data from them, must give clear notice, obtain verifiable parental consent before collecting, using or disclosing children's data, keep it secure and limit retention. The FTC amended its rule in 2025, adding separate consent for third-party disclosures, written security programmes and retention policies, with compliance required from April 2026.

Read the guide
Law United States

GLBA Safeguards Rule

Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (1999): FTC Standards for Safeguarding Customer Information (16 CFR Part 314) and privacy requirements

The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act is the US law governing how financial institutions protect and share consumers' financial information. Its FTC Safeguards Rule requires non-bank financial institutions, a broad group that includes many fintechs, lenders, brokers and tax preparers, to run a written information security program with a qualified individual in charge, risk assessments, encryption, MFA, monitoring, testing, vendor oversight and incident response, and to notify the FTC of certain breaches.

Read the guide
Framework Global (US origin)

NIST Privacy Framework

NIST Privacy Framework: A Tool for Improving Privacy through Enterprise Risk Management

The NIST Privacy Framework is a voluntary tool for managing privacy risk across an organisation. Modelled on the NIST Cybersecurity Framework, it organises privacy outcomes into Core functions for identifying, governing, controlling, communicating about and protecting data processing, and uses Profiles and Implementation Tiers to set targets and measure maturity. It is law-neutral, so organisations use it to build one privacy program that supports GDPR, US state laws, DPDP and other regimes.

Read the guide
Certifiable standard Global

ISO/IEC 27701

ISO/IEC 27701 Information security, cybersecurity and privacy protection: Privacy information management systems: Requirements and guidance

ISO/IEC 27701 is the international standard for a privacy information management system (PIMS): a managed way to protect personal data and meet privacy obligations as a controller, a processor or both. The 2025 edition made it a standalone, certifiable management system standard with its own clauses 4 to 10, no longer an extension that required ISO/IEC 27001. It includes control sets for controllers and processors and is widely used to structure compliance with laws such as the GDPR.

Read the guide
Compliance-ready software

Building software that has to pass an audit?

We build the parts auditors and privacy laws look for: role-based access, audit logs, encryption, consent records, data export and erasure, and secure development practices. Tell us about your product and get a free quote within one business day.

  • Free consultation and quote
  • NDA on request
  • You own the source code
  • Reply within one business day

Tell us about your product

Add budget and timeline optional, helps us quote faster

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.