Taking over a codebase someone else wrote
Reading comes before writing
For the first week your developer changes almost nothing. They get the application running locally from a database copy, which on old systems is a task in itself: missing extensions, hard-coded paths, credentials in a dozen files. They trace the main flows (login, the core transaction, the nightly cron jobs), list the external services the code calls and note anything alarming, such as passwords stored unhashed or queries built from raw input. You receive that as a plain document with three headings: urgent, soon and can wait.
Week two brings version control and a safety net
If the code is not in Git, it goes in. If deployment means copying files by FTP, we set up a staging server and a scripted deploy. Then the developer writes characterization tests around the most valuable paths. These tests record what the code does today without judging it, so a later change that alters an invoice total or a stock figure is caught at once.
How tasks move after that
Work arrives as tickets from your operations people or a product owner. For bugs, an example record and the expected result is the most useful thing you can give. The developer fixes the cause on a branch, extends the tests, opens a pull request and deploys to staging for you to confirm. Each change tidies the code it touches a little. Over months the worst files shrink, without a risky rewrite and without a freeze on new features. Reporting follows the engagement model you pick, from a note on completion to a daily summary.
Review and the rewrite question
Pull requests are read by a second developer, yours or ours, with attention to query safety and side effects on shared tables. Sooner or later someone asks whether to rewrite in a framework. Your developer should answer with evidence from your own code: how much is dead, how much is tangled, what a staged move to Laravel would involve against continuing as you are. If moving wins, a Laravel developer can join without starting from zero.
Deciding whether they are right for you
A strong PHP developer makes few promises in week one and keeps them. Watch for small, frequent, reversible changes. Be wary of anyone who proposes a rewrite before they can explain how your month-end run works. By the end of the first month you should also be able to read their notes and understand your own system better than you did before.