What working with your WordPress developer looks like
The first two weeks are mostly reading
Your developer starts by getting a copy of the site running on staging and under Git, even if it has never been in version control. They list every active plugin, note which ones are edited or abandoned, read the theme and check how deployments happen today. You get a short written inventory: what is safe to update, what is fragile and what they would fix first. In the same fortnight they close a few small tickets, because nothing shows how someone works faster than a real change going live.
How a normal week runs
Tasks arrive through your board or ours: Jira, Trello, Asana, a shared sheet, whatever you already use. A good WordPress ticket names the page or post type, says who it is for (editor, visitor, admin) and what done looks like. The developer estimates, asks questions in your channel and pushes the change to staging with a note on what to check. Most weeks mix small jobs, such as a template change or a form field, with one larger piece like a custom block or an integration. How often you get a written report depends on the model you choose in the table on this page.
Review, staging and who presses deploy
Nothing is edited on the live site. Changes go through a branch and a pull request, are checked against the WordPress coding standards and are tested on staging against the plugins you actually run. If you have a lead developer, they review and merge. If you do not, a second developer on our side reviews before the project manager asks for your sign-off. Plugin and core updates follow the same route, which is how you avoid the Friday update that takes the contact form down. Sites that need this care and little else may be better served by a WordPress maintenance plan.
How to tell if the fit is right
Within a month you should see three things. Tickets come back with questions that show the developer understood the business reason behind the instruction. Estimates are roughly right, and you are told early when they are not. And your editors notice that the site is easier to work with. If that is not what you see, tell the project manager. A developer who is not working out is replaced, and the contract carries a money-back clause.